1. | the hypothesis was validated or modified |
| |
2. | interventions that enhance a positve connotation or require the family to exaggerate or violate family rules |
| |
3. | assigning a postive motive or value to each family member |
| |
4. | female member of Milan Group |
| |
5. | interview technique consisting of questions and responses |
| |
6. | originally known as positive connotation, changed the problem from something terrible in the family to symptom is neither good nor bad, but understandable given the context |
| |
7. | members caught up in the unacknowledged secrets within the family |
| |
8. | team analysis of the session and forms a plan for the next session |
| |
9. | creative deceptions used by the therapist to by-pass resistance |
| P | A | R | A | D | O | X | I | C | A | L | | P | R | E | S | C | R | I | P | T | I | O | N | S | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
10. | original member of the Milan Group |
| |
| |
12. | the milan systemic group performed this |
| |
13. | the team formed an initial hypothesis |
| |
| |
15. | replaced by the term "curiosity", it is the stance of the therapist |
| |
16. | an assessment tool through which the therapist begins an exploration into the family system |
| |
17. | male member of Milan Group |
| |
18. | the therapists deliver the possitive connotation or ritual |
| |
19. | therapist given directive that on odd days one set of opinions are true and on even days false |
| |
20. | the team met alone to form an intervention |
| |
| |
22. | the therapist and the family are one unit |
| |
23. | the attributes of member to member interactions and to the form of interactions between the therapist and family |
| |
24. | male member of the Milan Group |
| |