| 1. | | the hypothesis was validated or modified |
| |
| 2. | | interventions that enhance a positve connotation or require the family to exaggerate or violate family rules |
| |
| 3. | | assigning a postive motive or value to each family member |
| |
| 4. | | female member of Milan Group |
| |
| 5. | | interview technique consisting of questions and responses |
| |
| 6. | | originally known as positive connotation, changed the problem from something terrible in the family to symptom is neither good nor bad, but understandable given the context |
| |
| 7. | | members caught up in the unacknowledged secrets within the family |
| |
| 8. | | team analysis of the session and forms a plan for the next session |
| |
| 9. | | creative deceptions used by the therapist to by-pass resistance |
| P | A | R | A | D | O | X | I | C | A | L | | P | R | E | S | C | R | I | P | T | I | O | N | S | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 10. | | original member of the Milan Group |
| |
| |
| 12. | | the milan systemic group performed this |
| |
| 13. | | the team formed an initial hypothesis |
| |
| |
| 15. | | replaced by the term "curiosity", it is the stance of the therapist |
| |
| 16. | | an assessment tool through which the therapist begins an exploration into the family system |
| |
| 17. | | male member of Milan Group |
| |
| 18. | | the therapists deliver the possitive connotation or ritual |
| |
| 19. | | therapist given directive that on odd days one set of opinions are true and on even days false |
| |
| 20. | | the team met alone to form an intervention |
| |
| |
| 22. | | the therapist and the family are one unit |
| |
| 23. | | the attributes of member to member interactions and to the form of interactions between the therapist and family |
| |
| 24. | | male member of the Milan Group |
| |
