1:00
en
CR
33
Fallacies : the reasoning or arguments which are valid but are actually invalid
Redundant : fallacy where some unnecessary terms are added to the definition
Accidental : fallacy where some accidental attributes which are not useful are added to the definition
Circular : fallacy where the definition should not be synonymous to the term it defines
Obscure : fallacy where the definition must be simple enough to easily understand
Figurative : do not use exaggeration in defining the term
Negative : do not use a definition which is not the meaning of the term but rather give the real meaning of the term
Crossdivision : this fallacy is also known as overlapping which is a violation of the golden rule of logical division
Remotedivision : our definition should depend upon the basis of division
Conversion : his fallacy arises when a term is undistributed in the converted then distributed in the converse
Obversion : this fallacy arises when in charging the obverted from the affirmative
Negativepremises : this is also known as the fallacy of two negatives which occurs when we draw a conclusion from two negative premises
Particularpremises : this is also known as the fallacy of two particulars
Illicitminor : this fallacy arises when the minor term becomes universal in the conclusion while it is only particular in the minor premise
IEO : this fallacy occurs when we draw a conclusion from IEO mood.
Language : this type of fallacy is committed due to lack of preciseness in the word, phrases used to express a thought
Equivocation : this fallacy is committed when some terms are used in the premise but with different meanings
Amphiboly : this fallacy arises from the ambiguous use not of a single word but of a phrase or of a complete sentence
Accent : this fallacy arises of a word which changes a meaning when the accent on the word changes
Composition : this fallacy is committed as words or phrases are taken jointly
Divisions : this fallacy is the opposite of composition
Falsecause : this fallacy arranges a wrong cause in a certain effect.
Accident : this fallacy arises when what is accidental or superficial is emphasized over what is essential
Contraries : opposite with the same quantity but differ in quality
Deduction : the relationship among the propositions in an argument in which the premises flow with logical necessity into the conclusion
judgement : is the mental act which affirms or denies something
Declarative : one which states a fact
Singular : the subject stands for a single definite individual
Particular : the subject designates an indefinite part of its total extension
Universal : the subject can apply to every portion signified by the term
Predicate : it is what is affirmed or denied of the subject
Hypothetical : this is a compound proposition which contains a proposed or tentative explanation
Conditional : this is a compound proposition in which one clause asserts something as true provided that the other clause is true
Compound : consists of at least two clauses connected by conjunctions, adverbs etc.
Disjunctive : this proposition sometimes called alternative proposition
Conjunctive : this proposition asserts that two alternatives cannot be true at the same time
Induction : the relationship among the proposition in an argument in which the premises do not flow with logical necessity into the conclusion
Inference : usually refers to the mental process of moving from the premises to the conclusion
Sequence : the implication or logical relation between antecedent and consequent
Explanation : the conclusion is not the logical conclusion
Antecedent : consequent relationship or the rules of syllogism
Eduction : method of rendering in another way the same fundamental truth embodied in a given proposition
Reasoning : third act of the mind and the highest level in the mental operation
Conversion : restating the truth of the proposition
Simple : this conversion takes place when the quantity of the original proposition remains unchanged in converse
Partial : this conversion happens when the quantity of the original proposition is changed in the converse
Contradictory : terms that belong to different genuses or classes
Contraposition : combination of conversion and obversion
Contraryterms : those that are belong to the same genus but are opposite within genus
Inversion : opposite of obversion
Majorterm : it is the predicate of the conclusion and is found in the major premise
Across:| 2. | one which states a fact | | 6. | fallacy where some unnecessary terms are added to the definition | | 10. | do not use a definition which is not the meaning of the term but rather give the real meaning of the term | | 13. | is the mental act which affirms or denies something | | 14. | this conversion takes place when the quantity of the original proposition remains unchanged in converse | | 15. | third act of the mind and the highest level in the mental operation | | 17. | this fallacy arises when the minor term becomes universal in the conclusion while it is only particular in the minor premise | | 18. | the subject can apply to every portion signified by the term | | 19. | his fallacy arises when a term is undistributed in the converted then distributed in the converse | | 21. | fallacy where some accidental attributes which are not useful are added to the definition | | 22. | the subject designates an indefinite part of its total extension | | 23. | the relationship among the propositions in an argument in which the premises flow with logical necessity into the conclusion | | 24. | consequent relationship or the rules of syllogism | | 28. | this fallacy is also known as overlapping which is a violation of the golden rule of logical division | | 30. | this is a compound proposition which contains a proposed or tentative explanation | | 31. | our definition should depend upon the basis of division | | 32. | this fallacy occurs when we draw a conclusion from IEO mood. | | 33. | terms that belong to different genuses or classes |
| | Down:| 1. | consists of at least two clauses connected by conjunctions, adverbs etc. | | 3. | this type of fallacy is committed due to lack of preciseness in the word, phrases used to express a thought | | 4. | fallacy where the definition must be simple enough to easily understand | | 5. | this fallacy arises of a word which changes a meaning when the accent on the word changes | | 7. | it is what is affirmed or denied of the subject | | 8. | this fallacy is the opposite of composition | | 9. | the subject stands for a single definite individual | | 11. | this is also known as the fallacy of two particulars | | 12. | this is also known as the fallacy of two negatives which occurs when we draw a conclusion from two negative premises | | 16. | restating the truth of the proposition | | 20. | this proposition asserts that two alternatives cannot be true at the same time | | 25. | opposite with the same quantity but differ in quality | | 26. | do not use exaggeration in defining the term | | 27. | fallacy where the definition should not be synonymous to the term it defines | | 29. | this fallacy arises when in charging the obverted from the affirmative |
| |
© 2014
PuzzleFast.com, Noncommercial Use Only
Across:| 2. | one which states a fact | | 6. | fallacy where some unnecessary terms are added to the definition | | 10. | do not use a definition which is not the meaning of the term but rather give the real meaning of the term | | 13. | is the mental act which affirms or denies something | | 14. | this conversion takes place when the quantity of the original proposition remains unchanged in converse | | 15. | third act of the mind and the highest level in the mental operation | | 17. | this fallacy arises when the minor term becomes universal in the conclusion while it is only particular in the minor premise | | 18. | the subject can apply to every portion signified by the term | | 19. | his fallacy arises when a term is undistributed in the converted then distributed in the converse | | 21. | fallacy where some accidental attributes which are not useful are added to the definition | | 22. | the subject designates an indefinite part of its total extension | | 23. | the relationship among the propositions in an argument in which the premises flow with logical necessity into the conclusion | | 24. | consequent relationship or the rules of syllogism | | 28. | this fallacy is also known as overlapping which is a violation of the golden rule of logical division | | 30. | this is a compound proposition which contains a proposed or tentative explanation | | 31. | our definition should depend upon the basis of division | | 32. | this fallacy occurs when we draw a conclusion from IEO mood. | | 33. | terms that belong to different genuses or classes |
| | Down:| 1. | consists of at least two clauses connected by conjunctions, adverbs etc. | | 3. | this type of fallacy is committed due to lack of preciseness in the word, phrases used to express a thought | | 4. | fallacy where the definition must be simple enough to easily understand | | 5. | this fallacy arises of a word which changes a meaning when the accent on the word changes | | 7. | it is what is affirmed or denied of the subject | | 8. | this fallacy is the opposite of composition | | 9. | the subject stands for a single definite individual | | 11. | this is also known as the fallacy of two particulars | | 12. | this is also known as the fallacy of two negatives which occurs when we draw a conclusion from two negative premises | | 16. | restating the truth of the proposition | | 20. | this proposition asserts that two alternatives cannot be true at the same time | | 25. | opposite with the same quantity but differ in quality | | 26. | do not use exaggeration in defining the term | | 27. | fallacy where the definition should not be synonymous to the term it defines | | 29. | this fallacy arises when in charging the obverted from the affirmative |
| |
© 2014
PuzzleFast.com, Noncommercial Use Only