1:00
en
CR
Fallacies Of Relevance
10
Ad Hominem Abusive : Arguments that attempt to avoid the issue by insulting an opponent with abusive language.
Ad Hominem Circumstantial : Arguments that try to discredit an opponent because of his or her background, afflictions, or self-interest in the matter at hand.
Tu Quoque : Arguments that assume that a rival's recommendation should be discounted because the rival does not always follow it themselves.
Genetic Fallacy : Arguments that state that an idea should be discounted simply because of its source or origin.
Appeal To Fear : Arguments that distract by making the audience feel afraid of the consequences of disagreeing with the speaker.
Appeal To Pity : Arguments that distract by making the audience feel sorry for the speaker or someone on behalf of whom the speaker is arguing.
Mob Appeal : Arguments that distract by making the audience want to be a part of the crowd or one of the "common people".
Snob Appeal : Arguments that distract by making the audience want to feel "special".
Appeal To Illegitimate Authority : Arguments that distract by attempting to shame the listener into agreement by citing an illegitimate authority.
Chronological Snobbery : Arguments that distract by making the audience want to either be a part of an old tradition or of the latest, cool, new thing.
Fallacies Of Relevance
Across:2. | Arguments that distract by making the audience want to be a part of the crowd or one of the "common people". | 5. | Arguments that distract by making the audience feel afraid of the consequences of disagreeing with the speaker. | 6. | Arguments that assume that a rival's recommendation should be discounted because the rival does not always follow it themselves. | 7. | Arguments that distract by making the audience want to either be a part of an old tradition or of the latest, cool, new thing. | 8. | Arguments that distract by making the audience feel sorry for the speaker or someone on behalf of whom the speaker is arguing. | 10. | Arguments that attempt to avoid the issue by insulting an opponent with abusive language. |
| | Down:1. | Arguments that distract by attempting to shame the listener into agreement by citing an illegitimate authority. | 3. | Arguments that try to discredit an opponent because of his or her background, afflictions, or self-interest in the matter at hand. | 4. | Arguments that state that an idea should be discounted simply because of its source or origin. | 9. | Arguments that distract by making the audience want to feel "special". |
| |
© 2015
PuzzleFast.com, Noncommercial Use Only
Fallacies Of Relevance
Across:2. | Arguments that distract by making the audience want to be a part of the crowd or one of the "common people". | 5. | Arguments that distract by making the audience feel afraid of the consequences of disagreeing with the speaker. | 6. | Arguments that assume that a rival's recommendation should be discounted because the rival does not always follow it themselves. | 7. | Arguments that distract by making the audience want to either be a part of an old tradition or of the latest, cool, new thing. | 8. | Arguments that distract by making the audience feel sorry for the speaker or someone on behalf of whom the speaker is arguing. | 10. | Arguments that attempt to avoid the issue by insulting an opponent with abusive language. |
| | Down:1. | Arguments that distract by attempting to shame the listener into agreement by citing an illegitimate authority. | 3. | Arguments that try to discredit an opponent because of his or her background, afflictions, or self-interest in the matter at hand. | 4. | Arguments that state that an idea should be discounted simply because of its source or origin. | 9. | Arguments that distract by making the audience want to feel "special". |
| |
© 2015
PuzzleFast.com, Noncommercial Use Only