1:00
en
CR
41
Middle:The term which is found in the two premise but not in the conclusion
Minor:Subject of the conclusion and is found in the minor premise
Major:Predicate of the conclusion
Syllogism:Propositional expression in which of certain things which have been laid down, something other than what has been laid down follows of necessity from being so
Categorical:Is a syllogism in which the proposition are all categorical
Subaltern:- Two affirmative or negative proposition having different quantities.
Subcontraries :There are two particular proposition which differ in quality.
Inversion:The opposite of obversion for it uses the contradictory of the original subject
Contraposition:Combination of conversion and obversion
Contrary:Those that belong to the same genuses, but are opposite within genuses
Contradictory:Terms that belong to the different genuses or clases.
Obverse:The re-statement of the obversion
Obvertend :The original Proposition of the obversion.
Obversion:Method of re-expressing truth by changing the quality of the copula so that the affirmative is rendered negative and the negative is rendered affirmative.
Converse:The resulting restatement
Convertend :The original proposition to be converted
Coversion:Restating the truth of the proposition by interchanging the subject and the predicate of the original proposition without over extending the quantity of either of the terms.
Eduction :- Method of rendering in another way the same fundamental truth embodied in a given proposition.
Inference:Mental operation through which the mind arrives at a new judgement by means of previously known judgement.
Reasoning :The third act of the mind and the highest level in the mental operation.
Definition:Fallacy being committed when the definition is wider than the term it connotes.
Narrow:Fallacy of Definition being committed when the definition is too narrow
Circular:Fallacy of definition where the definition should not be the synonymous to the term it defines.
Negative :Fallacy of the definition where it do not use a definition which is not the meaning of the term but rather give the real meaning of the term.
IEO:The fallacy occurs when we draw a conclusion from IEO mood.
Words:Expressive of ideas or concepts.
Concrete:Is a concept which expresses a form and a subject
Conditional:Compound proposition in which one clause asserts something as true provided that the other clause is true.
Positive :Concept that signifies the existence or possesions of something
apocryphal:Means fictitious
copula:links the subject with the predicate
Deduction:proceeds from the universal to particular
Induction:proceeds from particular to universal
Dummy:letters
Formula:statement form
Universal:traditional logic universal quantifier
Existential:traditional logical particular quantifier
copula:links the subject with the predicate
Deduction:proceeds from the universal to particular
Induction:proceeds from particular to universal
Dummy:letters
Relations :the point of comparison
Antecedent:which comes before
Across:2. | Predicate of the conclusion | 4. | The original proposition to be converted | 5. | Fallacy of definition where the definition should not be the synonymous to the term it defines. | 6. | Is a concept which expresses a form and a subject | 8. | Is a syllogism in which the proposition are all categorical | 9. | the point of comparison | 11. | proceeds from the universal to particular | 15. | The opposite of obversion for it uses the contradictory of the original subject | 17. | The term which is found in the two premise but not in the conclusion | 23. | The fallacy occurs when we draw a conclusion from IEO mood. | 24. | statement form | 27. | There are two particular proposition which differ in quality. | 29. | Method of re-expressing truth by changing the quality of the copula so that the affirmative is rendered negative and the negative is rendered affirmative. | 31. | The original Proposition of the obversion. | 32. | traditional logic universal quantifier | 33. | - Two affirmative or negative proposition having different quantities. | 34. | Fallacy being committed when the definition is wider than the term it connotes. | 35. | The re-statement of the obversion | 36. | links the subject with the predicate | 36. | links the subject with the predicate |
| | Down:1. | Concept that signifies the existence or possesions of something | 2. | Subject of the conclusion and is found in the minor premise | 3. | - Method of rendering in another way the same fundamental truth embodied in a given proposition. | 7. | traditional logical particular quantifier | 8. | Those that belong to the same genuses, but are opposite within genuses | 10. | Expressive of ideas or concepts. | 12. | The resulting restatement | 13. | Terms that belong to the different genuses or clases. | 14. | The third act of the mind and the highest level in the mental operation. | 16. | Propositional expression in which of certain things which have been laid down, something other than what has been laid down follows of necessity from being so | 18. | letters | 18. | letters | 19. | proceeds from the universal to particular | 20. | Fallacy of the definition where it do not use a definition which is not the meaning of the term but rather give the real meaning of the term. | 21. | Compound proposition in which one clause asserts something as true provided that the other clause is true. | 22. | proceeds from particular to universal | 22. | proceeds from particular to universal | 25. | which comes before | 26. | Combination of conversion and obversion | 28. | Mental operation through which the mind arrives at a new judgement by means of previously known judgement. | 30. | Fallacy of Definition being committed when the definition is too narrow |
| |
© 2014
PuzzleFast.com, Noncommercial Use Only
Across:2. | Predicate of the conclusion | 4. | The original proposition to be converted | 5. | Fallacy of definition where the definition should not be the synonymous to the term it defines. | 6. | Is a concept which expresses a form and a subject | 8. | Is a syllogism in which the proposition are all categorical | 9. | the point of comparison | 11. | proceeds from the universal to particular | 15. | The opposite of obversion for it uses the contradictory of the original subject | 17. | The term which is found in the two premise but not in the conclusion | 23. | The fallacy occurs when we draw a conclusion from IEO mood. | 24. | statement form | 27. | There are two particular proposition which differ in quality. | 29. | Method of re-expressing truth by changing the quality of the copula so that the affirmative is rendered negative and the negative is rendered affirmative. | 31. | The original Proposition of the obversion. | 32. | traditional logic universal quantifier | 33. | - Two affirmative or negative proposition having different quantities. | 34. | Fallacy being committed when the definition is wider than the term it connotes. | 35. | The re-statement of the obversion | 36. | links the subject with the predicate | 36. | links the subject with the predicate |
| | Down:1. | Concept that signifies the existence or possesions of something | 2. | Subject of the conclusion and is found in the minor premise | 3. | - Method of rendering in another way the same fundamental truth embodied in a given proposition. | 7. | traditional logical particular quantifier | 8. | Those that belong to the same genuses, but are opposite within genuses | 10. | Expressive of ideas or concepts. | 12. | The resulting restatement | 13. | Terms that belong to the different genuses or clases. | 14. | The third act of the mind and the highest level in the mental operation. | 16. | Propositional expression in which of certain things which have been laid down, something other than what has been laid down follows of necessity from being so | 18. | letters | 18. | letters | 19. | proceeds from the universal to particular | 20. | Fallacy of the definition where it do not use a definition which is not the meaning of the term but rather give the real meaning of the term. | 21. | Compound proposition in which one clause asserts something as true provided that the other clause is true. | 22. | proceeds from particular to universal | 22. | proceeds from particular to universal | 25. | which comes before | 26. | Combination of conversion and obversion | 28. | Mental operation through which the mind arrives at a new judgement by means of previously known judgement. | 30. | Fallacy of Definition being committed when the definition is too narrow |
| |
© 2014
PuzzleFast.com, Noncommercial Use Only