Puzzle 20140326292769

en CR 41 Middle:The term which is found in the two premise but not in the conclusion Minor:Subject of the conclusion and is found in the minor premise Major:Predicate of the conclusion Syllogism:Propositional expression in which of certain things which have been laid down, something other than what has been laid down follows of necessity from being so Categorical:Is a syllogism in which the proposition are all categorical Subaltern:- Two affirmative or negative proposition having different quantities. Subcontraries :There are two particular proposition which differ in quality. Inversion:The opposite of obversion for it uses the contradictory of the original subject Contraposition:Combination of conversion and obversion Contrary:Those that belong to the same genuses, but are opposite within genuses Contradictory:Terms that belong to the different genuses or clases. Obverse:The re-statement of the obversion Obvertend :The original Proposition of the obversion. Obversion:Method of re-expressing truth by changing the quality of the copula so that the affirmative is rendered negative and the negative is rendered affirmative. Converse:The resulting restatement Convertend :The original proposition to be converted Coversion:Restating the truth of the proposition by interchanging the subject and the predicate of the original proposition without over extending the quantity of either of the terms. Eduction :- Method of rendering in another way the same fundamental truth embodied in a given proposition. Inference:Mental operation through which the mind arrives at a new judgement by means of previously known judgement. Reasoning :The third act of the mind and the highest level in the mental operation. Definition:Fallacy being committed when the definition is wider than the term it connotes. Narrow:Fallacy of Definition being committed when the definition is too narrow Circular:Fallacy of definition where the definition should not be the synonymous to the term it defines. Negative :Fallacy of the definition where it do not use a definition which is not the meaning of the term but rather give the real meaning of the term. IEO:The fallacy occurs when we draw a conclusion from IEO mood. Words:Expressive of ideas or concepts. Concrete:Is a concept which expresses a form and a subject Conditional:Compound proposition in which one clause asserts something as true provided that the other clause is true. Positive :Concept that signifies the existence or possesions of something apocryphal:Means fictitious copula:links the subject with the predicate Deduction:proceeds from the universal to particular Induction:proceeds from particular to universal Dummy:letters Formula:statement form Universal:traditional logic universal quantifier Existential:traditional logical particular quantifier copula:links the subject with the predicate Deduction:proceeds from the universal to particular Induction:proceeds from particular to universal Dummy:letters Relations :the point of comparison Antecedent:which comes before

						1												2
	3				4			V
																		N
					5												6 C					7
																		R
8							C
																9			A
			10		11	E			12
	N														13
						14		15		V			16
	17	I																			18
R
				19		S										20				21
		22				O					23								24		M		25
																G		26
																A
	27						T													I
																							C
											28				29					I	30
				31					T
		O
																		O
						32						S

			33 S										34	E
																		I
					35												36		P

Across:

2.	Predicate of the conclusion
4.	The original proposition to be converted
5.	Fallacy of definition where the definition should not be the synonymous to the term it defines.
6.	Is a concept which expresses a form and a subject
8.	Is a syllogism in which the proposition are all categorical
9.	the point of comparison
11.	proceeds from the universal to particular
15.	The opposite of obversion for it uses the contradictory of the original subject
17.	The term which is found in the two premise but not in the conclusion
23.	The fallacy occurs when we draw a conclusion from IEO mood.
24.	statement form
27.	There are two particular proposition which differ in quality.
29.	Method of re-expressing truth by changing the quality of the copula so that the affirmative is rendered negative and the negative is rendered affirmative.
31.	The original Proposition of the obversion.
32.	traditional logic universal quantifier
33.	- Two affirmative or negative proposition having different quantities.
34.	Fallacy being committed when the definition is wider than the term it connotes.
35.	The re-statement of the obversion
36.	links the subject with the predicate
36.	links the subject with the predicate

Down:

1.	Concept that signifies the existence or possesions of something
2.	Subject of the conclusion and is found in the minor premise
3.	- Method of rendering in another way the same fundamental truth embodied in a given proposition.
7.	traditional logical particular quantifier
8.	Those that belong to the same genuses, but are opposite within genuses
10.	Expressive of ideas or concepts.
12.	The resulting restatement
13.	Terms that belong to the different genuses or clases.
14.	The third act of the mind and the highest level in the mental operation.
16.	Propositional expression in which of certain things which have been laid down, something other than what has been laid down follows of necessity from being so
18.	letters
18.	letters
19.	proceeds from the universal to particular
20.	Fallacy of the definition where it do not use a definition which is not the meaning of the term but rather give the real meaning of the term.
21.	Compound proposition in which one clause asserts something as true provided that the other clause is true.
22.	proceeds from particular to universal
22.	proceeds from particular to universal
25.	which comes before
26.	Combination of conversion and obversion
28.	Mental operation through which the mind arrives at a new judgement by means of previously known judgement.
30.	Fallacy of Definition being committed when the definition is too narrow

Across:

2.	Predicate of the conclusion
4.	The original proposition to be converted
5.	Fallacy of definition where the definition should not be the synonymous to the term it defines.
6.	Is a concept which expresses a form and a subject
8.	Is a syllogism in which the proposition are all categorical
9.	the point of comparison
11.	proceeds from the universal to particular
15.	The opposite of obversion for it uses the contradictory of the original subject
17.	The term which is found in the two premise but not in the conclusion
23.	The fallacy occurs when we draw a conclusion from IEO mood.
24.	statement form
27.	There are two particular proposition which differ in quality.
29.	Method of re-expressing truth by changing the quality of the copula so that the affirmative is rendered negative and the negative is rendered affirmative.
31.	The original Proposition of the obversion.
32.	traditional logic universal quantifier
33.	- Two affirmative or negative proposition having different quantities.
34.	Fallacy being committed when the definition is wider than the term it connotes.
35.	The re-statement of the obversion
36.	links the subject with the predicate
36.	links the subject with the predicate

Down:

1.	Concept that signifies the existence or possesions of something
2.	Subject of the conclusion and is found in the minor premise
3.	- Method of rendering in another way the same fundamental truth embodied in a given proposition.
7.	traditional logical particular quantifier
8.	Those that belong to the same genuses, but are opposite within genuses
10.	Expressive of ideas or concepts.
12.	The resulting restatement
13.	Terms that belong to the different genuses or clases.
14.	The third act of the mind and the highest level in the mental operation.
16.	Propositional expression in which of certain things which have been laid down, something other than what has been laid down follows of necessity from being so
18.	letters
18.	letters
19.	proceeds from the universal to particular
20.	Fallacy of the definition where it do not use a definition which is not the meaning of the term but rather give the real meaning of the term.
21.	Compound proposition in which one clause asserts something as true provided that the other clause is true.
22.	proceeds from particular to universal
22.	proceeds from particular to universal
25.	which comes before
26.	Combination of conversion and obversion
28.	Mental operation through which the mind arrives at a new judgement by means of previously known judgement.
30.	Fallacy of Definition being committed when the definition is too narrow